Wait…is everything a stealth marketing campaign?
the illusion of free will
An investigation by Vulture has claimed that underground agencies, often living on closed platforms like Discord, are paying ordinary people to post clips and create artificial hype around everything from Justin Bieber to skincare brands. Is every trend and social media conversation secretly being manipulated by stealth marketing?
What if everything you see online, such as a viral cultural moment, a skincare product, a controversial celebrity scandal, or an election campaign, was manipulated and promoted by niche marketing agencies that create artificial outrage and conversation?
This phenomenon is apparently very real and is permeating every social media platform almost completely undetected, at least according to an investigative report by Vulture. Titled ‘The Feed is Fake,’ this excellent article outlines an underground system in which regular people are paid to clip content and promote different intellectual properties in order to push algorithms and generate discussions that seem authentic. Vulture suggests that almost every brand and company is getting involved, from big record labels to independent podcasters.
What does this mean, in real terms?
Agencies such as Spade, Clipping Culture, and ClipHaus hire tens of thousands of independent creators who repurpose content and redistribute it to spark algorithms into action. This could be through fan pages, meme pages, anonymous accounts, live clips, or background audio on unrelated visual media. They also drum up controversy or discussion on specific topics to boost engagement and create issues out of minor discrepancies.
“It feels disconcerting to know that anything we see online might be quietly orchestrated by a team of anonymous freelance clippers and accounts.”
These initial ‘boosts’ then enter mainstream feeds, where genuine human viewers begin to share and engage, thereby creating a ‘viral’ trend that seemingly appears to be authentic. It’s not the same as a paid promotion or traditional advertising campaign and is wholly different from the tried-and-tested method of bots and paid viewership, as everyone involved is a real person. This means it’s technically within social media fair use and is largely unaffected by current content policies.
Stealth marketing has, by sheer definition, remained largely undetected for a while now. It has recently been brought to the forefront thanks to several high-profile admissions of paid underground campaigns by agency founders (though, at this point, I wonder if it’s all by design) who boast they can ‘drive impressions on anything.’ This particular flex came from advertising company Chaotic Good Projects via a Billboard podcast titled ‘On The Record,’ who were outlining their marketing campaign for the alternative rock band Geese.
As WIRED mentioned last month, Geese are a Brooklyn-based act that generated significant buzz last year for their fourth album, Getting Killed. It quickly gained traction with enthusiastic music-goers, eventually culminating in a sold-out tour, a Saturday Night Live performance, and a Coachella appearance. Soon after, accusations of being ‘industry plants’ began to surface, with a popular Substack piece pinpointing the relationship between Geese and Chaotic Good’s stealth marketing services. The agency confirmed that it had indeed clipped content for the band, pushing short performance videos and interview segments online.
Soon after this was made public, Chaotic Good removed any mention of Geese from its website and took down its ‘narrative campaigns’ page that explicitly detailed how the company drives artificial conversation on social media platforms. WIRED concludes its article by asking whether this kind of new-age, guerilla-style marketing is any different to paid blog advertisements from last decade, or bribing radio stations with lavish gifts in the pre-internet era. Has anything ever been genuine in pop culture? That’s likely a wider question that requires greater analysis.
“These marketing firms will tell you their work is simply modern advertising that utilises different avenues of engagement.”
Still, it feels disconcerting to know that anything we see online might be premeditated and quietly orchestrated by a team of anonymous freelance clippers and accounts. Vulture highlights that journalists and critics, the traditional cultural gatekeepers of quality, are being duped by their social media feeds as much as anyone else. This, in turn, warps who is deemed ‘important’ by prestigious publications and outlets, canonising brands and artists in unconsciously biased ways. Bieber’s recent Coachella performances look to have followed some of these stealth marketing strategies, which means we were fooled and unwittingly contributed to his recent success. Oof.
These marketing firms will likely tell you that their work is simply modern, forward-thinking advertising that utilises different avenues of engagement to maximise reach for a fraction of the cost that a physical billboard demands. Why pay $1000 for a real poster or a standard YouTube sponsor when a stealth approach can be literally ten times more efficient? It’s good business and is clearly insanely effective, reportedly being utilised by nearly every industry you can imagine, from stock markets to elections to celebrity drama. It is seemingly everywhere and inescapable.
What makes it so ethically concerning is that our understanding of truth, curated taste, and human art is being coerced by invisible forces that nobody is really aware of. Gen Z are already facing an unprecedented era of misinformation amidst the emergence of AI. Understanding what is real and what is generated by ChatGPT is hard enough, let alone trying to decipher which cultural moments or artists are genuine and which are calculated ‘campaigns’ via semi-anonymous clipping farms on Discord.
As we know, Gen Z are reshaping how we interpret truth and where we get our intellectual credibility from. They’re no longer necessarily turning to legacy institutions such as the BBC or newspapers like The Times or The Guardian for information, but rather forming their opinions via TikTok and Instagram. Social media sites are incentivised to prioritise engagement at all costs, and aren’t as bound to rigorous legitimacy checks. This creates the perfect breeding ground for stealth marketing firms to dictate the direction of pop culture and mainstream public sentiment. Real individual agency begins to erode, leaving the marketplace of ideas weaker and more commercialised than ever. Throw in AI on top of that, and it leaves the internet thoroughly washed of its original, democratic sensibilities.
Perhaps The Gen Zer is also part of a stealth marketing campaign. We’re not saying it is, of course, but the fact that it’s impossible to tell is problematic.
See also:
🌍 Gen Z around the Web
the latest stories in youth culture and changing trends…
Gen Z’s AI backlash is getting louder (business insider)
Well, it’s official: Gen Z kind of hates AI, despite using it every day. As part of many graduations currently underway in the US, speakers at commencement ceremonies have been giving speeches to students. Google CEO Eric Schmidt and Big Machine Records CEO Scott Borchetta were two such speakers who were recently booed for mentioning AI. Data suggests that young people are becoming increasingly anxious and angry toward ChatGPT and other similar LLMs. What can we do to alleviate their woes? Read more
The great Gen Z dividing line (the atlantic)
What happens when an entire generation of young people is split by the rise of social media, an absolute upending of politics, and the emergence of AI? It turns out that Gen Z are largely shifted into two categories based on their age. Research suggests that those born between 1997 and the mid-noughties are more likely to be left-leaning and have a different relationship to online media and world politics compared to younger Gen Zers, especially men. This piece looks at the nuances between the two camps and how they might change as they grow older. Read more
Gen Z calls degrees ‘useless’ - but twenty years of data tells a different story (fortune)
More of us than ever are taking the leap and committing to universities. Despite the cost and lifelong financial burden, Gen Z continue to apply for degrees in droves, leaving them with decades of debt. Many say that their time in further education wasn’t worth the hassle, as they struggle to find work and get themselves on the corporate ladder. Still, new data suggests that unemployment rates for graduates are at their lowest in twenty years. Have we got it all wrong? Read more
Gen Z is pioneering a new understanding of truth (wired)
As we all know, social media has had significant ramifications for Gen Z’s mental health and ability to connect with each other. It has also reshaped the ways in which young people understand and verify information. Where every generation preceding them relied on institutions and slow, methodical systems to provide them with balanced media, Gen Z have instead grown up with an algorithmic feed that runs on engagement and outrage rather than academic credibility. This reshaped, more social idea of ‘truth’ needs to be understood as they grow older and influence our political structures. Read more
Going viral isn’t cool anymore. How should brands show up? (vogue)
The days of popularity online are steadily fading, as social media increasingly shifts toward niche, ultra-personalised communities and content feeds. Brands trying to chase a Gen Z trend or widespread ‘virality’ are likely to be wasting their time, as more young people shift toward personalised, chaotic, individual fashion choices that are nostalgic but authentic. ‘Clean girl’ aesthetics and perfect influencer feeds are starting to be aged out. It’s probably for the best, all things considered. Read more
📚 Substack’ed picks of the Week
Our top Gen Z substack posts…
‘Michael’ is a movie about nothing and no one (kate <3)
The new Michael Jackson biopic has been a roaring success, with several of his biggest hits reentering the charts this week. Despite being a commercial juggernaut, critics have largely banned this toothless, biased, and painfully simplified depiction of a pop star whose personal life was endlessly complicated and suspicious. This excellent review by @doloreshazed examines the flattening of Michael Jackson in this film, considering the many societal, racial, and personal elements that are left on the cutting room floor for the sake of brand preservation. Read more
Ugly girl manifesto (father_karine)
If you need a good laugh while also taking pause on the sheer absurdity of the incel movement, this satirical ‘manifesto’ piece by @father_karine explores the sheer horror of being an ‘ugly girl’ in an image-obsessed world, detailing the many (fictional, we assume) injustices she has faced as a result of her unfortunate looks. In case it wasn’t obvious, this is a comedic article that pokes fun at some of the leaps in logic that incel communities take when justifying their misogynistic views. We genuinely laughed out loud several times reading this one. Read more
That’s all for this week! Make sure to subscribe for the latest on Gen Z and youth culture, and check out The Common Thred for a weekly roundup of the latest news, trends, and thought pieces.
